We are redirecting you to the source. If you are not redirected in 3 seconds, please click here.

Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - US at G2i Inc.. Remote Location: United States. Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week. Check out this Loom video for more details: . https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5. We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.. This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.. What this role actually is. You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:. • Whether the response makes sense. • Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful. • Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment. • Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer. This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.. What you'll be doing. • Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end. • Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think. • Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code. • Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4). • Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading. • Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code. What we mean by "taste". We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:. • Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?. • Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?. • Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?. • Would this interaction build or erode trust?. You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.. Who you are. • Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience). • Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python. • Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor. • Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows. • Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line. • Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement. • Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback. • High bar for what good engineering looks like. Nice to have. • Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows. • Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards. Engagement details. • Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location. • Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible. • Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well. • Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat. • Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview